i like shoes.
especially tennis shoes (which, by the way, i do not play,but calling them "running shoes" would be odd, too, since i do not do that, either, i guess i could call them "workout shoes"...but that is not as...ummm? cute?)
recently, baby needed new shoes...and we got nea a pair of pumas for her to run and soccer and play in. she loves them!
karl prefers either reebok or new balance for his feet.
wren has a pair of nikes. pink, of course.
and i have toggled between aesics and nikes.
until today. well, actually, until this past monday.
i got myself a pair of pumas on monday. and totally love 'em! they are light! they have great arch support! and they are my new faves! plus they were $10-$20 less than the aesic and nike styles i liked. they are not pink. nor are they sparkley. i guess one could say i wanted to be just like my nea.
so...in case i thought i made a mistake by not sticking to my good ole faithful nike brand...today i received my answer:
nike's latest ad featuring tiger is pathetic. digusting. and completely inappropriate. and i think i might be done with nike for a while.
without going into great depth of my own personal feeling about tiger, i will merely say this:
tiger became a spokes person for nike because of his amazing athletic ability on the golf course. nike should've kept on topic.